By: Derek Jung
It was bound to happen again.
Last week, Joseph, a few friends, and I saw Mastodon, and the opening act was none other than Eagles of Death Metal, who were performing at the Bataclan during the November 2015 Paris attacks that left 130 people dead, 89 inside the theater alone. Horrific images of bodies strewn about the dance floor flooded the internet, and stories of survivors echoed on news stations around the world. For concertgoers, it was a wake up call that somewhere so sacred and so safe could be violated by such an evil act. I had seen Eagles of Death Metal with my wife less than two months before the attack. To think that something could have happened to us while watching one of my favorite bands chilled me to the bone.
I remember attending my first show post-Bataclan. It was a week after the attack and I was seeing Houndmouth at my second home, Madison Theater. I found myself morbidly aware of the exit signs in case I needed to make a mad dash to escape. The unpleasant mixture of excitement and nervousness made my stomach churn, excited to be back at a show again and nervous that someone would be inspired by events halfway around the world and try to hurt us. But the show went on without a hitch and everything started to feel ok again. Life returned to normal as it always does and I rarely thought about my safety at shows. That is, until last week.
Eagles of Death Metal frontman Jesse Hughes was out front before the show taking pictures with fans and thanking each police officer for their service. It was a simple gesture, but it demonstrated how different life was for him. After staring pure evil in the eyes and watching friends and fans die in front of him, I can't imagine the strength it takes to get on stage every night to perform. There was a noticeable security presence at the show that night and I couldn't help but thinking that, in the back of Jesse's mind, he feared it could happen again. But once again nothing happened and the thought faded from memory.
This past Friday Joseph, my wife, my brother, and a friend saw Red Hot Chili Peppers at US Bank Arena, where another non-terrorist related tragedy happened nearly forty years prior. Eleven fans were trampled while trying to enter to see The Who. Security has been upped in recent years and we even received an email reminder of new security protocols and to arrive early. It wasn't until the conclusion of the show, when we were walking towards the exits did I feel the unnerving sensation that something was wrong. Loud booms echoed through the stadium and for a split second I was afraid. The Friday night fireworks at the Cincinnati Reds game next to the arena had begun. There was no attack. We were completely safe. I didn't think twice about it.
Less than three days later, Manchester England was rocked by a different boom as concertgoers exited an Ariana Grande show. At last count, twenty-two people were killed by a suicide bomber, many of them children and teenagers. Their safe place was shattered in an instant. We live in a different world. Cowardly acts of terrorism are becoming more frequent, and it's increasingly important to be diligent and aware of potential dangers in public. I'm not going to offer any solutions, because frankly I don't have any. Security measures can only go so far. My condolences to all of those affected by both attacks. My condolences to their families, friends, and to Ariana Grande, who will live with this pain for the rest of her life. I hope Jesse reaches out to her. I'm sure she needs some assurance that everything is going to be ok.
I'm not going to stop attending shows. After the Paris attacks I wanted to go to a show that same night in solidarity. They make me happy and I love connecting with and sharing music. It's what I do and nothing is going to end that. I'm sure that Manchester, with such a rich musical history (The Bee Gees, The Smiths, and Oasis to name a few), will continue to be a beacon in the music industry. No coward can take that away. Rock on, Manchester.
Top image source: NPR.org
By: The Busted Amp Staff
JOSEPH: Well, they did it. They snubbed Queen Bey once more. As much as I was rooting for Sturgill Simpson to upset everyone just to see his acceptance speech, I was shocked to hear Adele's name called. This moment was unexpected, but it is (and rightfully so) dominating the talk of the Grammys, as Beyonce is now an unprecedented 0 for 4 when it comes to AotY nominations/wins. But it looked like Adele was just as shocked as I was, and she proceeded to deliver one of the most humble acceptance speeches I have ever heard, during which she proclaimed Queen Bey the deserving winner. Adele's transcendence into legend didn't stop there. After the ceremony she split the award in two and gave the other half to Queen Bey in what has to be one of the best disses ever towards the Academy. This to me highlighted what was a mixed bag from this year's Grammy's.
On the one hand and for the most part....the Grammy's were pretty good with the winners. David Bowie swept all of his categories, including the stacked Alternative AotY category, and Chance the Rapper made a YUGE splash as well.
Sturgill did get his Best Country Album award, which is still a pretty strong statement to Nashville's Bro Country scene, and Megadeth even won it's first (and incredibly overdue) Grammy. Overall the performances were solid, with my highlights surprisingly being the two hip-hop performances from A Tribe Called Quest and Chance the Rapper, as well as Katy Perry's stunning Grammy-esque performance. But it seemed for every great thing the Grammy's did, there was an equally crappy thing to boot.
There were several lowlights, but to me the low point was, once again, the heavy rock performance. It's amazing how it seems every year the problems with the Grammy's lie in their one heavy rock performance, and their Lady Gaga/Metallica performance was marred by sound issues and the presenter actually forgetting to mention that Metallica was even a part of the performance. About the only thing that could've made it worse was if CBS had cut to black randomly during it. Additionally, what the heck was going on with that Keith Urban/Carrie Underwood duet? Really don't understand how the Academy thought it was a good idea to put two of the biggest names in country right now for the most generic 80s pop song ever. I mean I get that Bro Country is bad right now, but c'mon. It's not that bad. Also, and I think Derek may disagree with me on this, but I was not a huge fan of James Corden. He had a few moments that were alright, but they were sprinkled in between shameless and obvious CBS plugs for his Late Late Show, which were completely unnecessary. I fear that the Oscars will suffer the same fate in this regard in a few weeks, as they are on ABC and are being hosted by Jimmy Kimmel.
Derek: Ah yes, the 2017 Grammy's.
I'd agree with Joseph. For an awards show that has a history of making some head scratching decisions, I was pleased to see just how many they got right. If you were keeping track at home, we were right 50% of the time for our "who will win" predictions but 67% right for who we thought should win. Maybe we should have a little more faith in the Grammy voters next year? Not a chance. Adele winning Album of the Year for 25 over Beyonce is almost as bad as Taylor Swift winning over Kendrick Lamar last year.
There's going to be a lot of speculation into why Beyonce lost, so I'll throw a few thoughts into the ring. Frankly, I think TIDAL killed her chances. By streaming her album exclusively on TIDAL, a service that has only 1% of the global streaming subscriptions and no free tier, she cut off an impressively large audience for her music. Yes, Adele did the same thing for a few months, but eventually she came around and added her catalog to the major streaming services. I'd argue that enough voters were cut off from hearing her album, especially the older Grammy voters, that Adele was able to win out.
In terms of performances, the highlight for me was Sturgill Simpson's brilliant rendition of "All Around You" with the Dap-Kings, who helped him record his newly crowned Best Country Album. While he didn't pull off a dramatic upset for Album of the Year, he can be extremely proud of the showing. He also had a noteworthy post-Grammy celebration.
Bruno Mars had a stellar tribute for Prince, much better than the unwatchable David Bowie tribute that Lady Gaga put on last year. Speaking of Gaga, her performance with Metallica this year wasn't much better. Putting on her best 80's hair metal stripper impression while James Hetfield battled microphone issues, she definitely won the "trainwreck performance I can't turn away from" award for the night, but she wasn't the only one. James Corden, riding the success of his Carpool Karaoke bit into a hosting gig, was a mess the whole night, as was the production. Can someone please get a bigger teleprompter so the presenters can actually read what they're supposed to say? I feel bad for John Travolta, who suffered another awards show blunder when he couldn't make out his speech, so he just winged it. It wasn't his fault, and he wasn't the only one affected by it either. Travolta was at the Grammys to celebrate the 40th anniversary of Saturday Night Fever and The Bee Gees, which had a fun medley tribute from Devi Levato, Tori Kelly, Little Big Town, and Andra Day. I was very surprised that they didn't do a tribute for Leonard Cohen or Merle Haggard, and if it were my show, I'd have cut the Bee Gees tribute in favor of giving Cohen and Haggard the tributes they deserved. Or at least cut a little off of Beyonce's nearly 10 minute performance, which granted will probably be one of the night's most watched clips. But goodness was that production excruciatingly long.
Jospeh: In conclusion, I think the biggest highlight for me tonight was Adele. I have never truly understood why people revere her as much as they do, but after watching her stop a tribute to George Michael mid-song so she could get it perfect for him, and after breaking down because she thought Beyonce deserved the highest profile award of the night, I can see why. However, both of these moments were accidental #GrammyMoments, and there were far too many attempts to "manufacture" #GrammyMoments for me to enjoy the show too much. Maybe it's just cause I'm cynical, but I just can't get the crappy parts of the night out of my head. Sure, there were great moments with Sturgill Simpson making even his ballads sound awesome and Bruno Mars delivering the Prince tribute to end all Prince tributes, but....I don't know. Hopefully as time goes on we'll just remember the good parts of this year's show, but right now I just can't shake the bad. And, of course, it all starts with yet another snubbing of Queen Bey.
By: The Busted Amp Staff
Another year in the books and here we are in 2017 already. Even though we lost an excruciatingly large number of legendary artists in 2016, David Bowie, Prince, Leonard Cohen, 2/3 of Emerson, Lake, and Palmer, and more, we also saw the rise of new artists that are putting their mark on the industry.
We at The Busted Amp are honored that you've taken this journey with us. Collectively we've seen dozens of shows and listened to tens of thousands of songs. Every part of it was an adventure that we wouldn't trade for anything. While it's so difficult to narrow down what we saw and listened to this year, we've made our best attempt. What follows is each of our favorite albums, songs, and shows from 2016. We hope you discover something new that you might have missed. Or maybe you see one of your favorites and want to bask in its glory with us. Or maybe you think our tastes in music suck, but why would you be reading this if you thought that? I'm not really sure. But I digress.
It should be noted that a lot of you may notice the absence of one album in particular from our list. An album from Beyonce. While this album is making a lot of top ten lists out there, it is completely absent from ours for one simple reason: the album isn't available to stream on Spotify. Beyonce has chosen to jump on a new trend started by Taylor Swift and championed by Adele: delaying an album's Spotify release to increase album sales. While it may make them a few more bucks, it's not a good move for the industry as a whole, as it ignores the real problem which is miniscule compensation for artists on Spotify. Let's just leave that for the jam band struggling to make ends meet, right? As a result we have made no effort to listen to the album. And yes, that also means that we made our Grammy predictions based solely on the hype. Sorry, Bey. #1 in our hearts. Forever.
Derek's Favorites of 2016
Best Albums of 2016
Best Songs of 2016
Best Shows of 2016
Disappointing Album of 2016
Joseph's Favorites of 2016
Best Albums of 2016
Best Songs of 2016
Best Shows of 2016
Disappointing Album of 2016
Thanks for reading, everyone! Here's to a great 2017!
By: The Busted Amp Staff
Oh, the Grammys. If you remember our preview from last year, you'll know that we at The Busted Amp have never been big fans of The Grammys. In fact, we tend to despise it from time to time. But, in a world where music awards shows dominate, we would be remiss if we didn't spend some time talking about the picks.
So here are our 2017 Grammy predictions based on the nominees.
Derek: From someone that tries to avoid mainstream pop at all costs, two of these albums are obviously puzzlers to me. Justin Bieber's Purpose and Drake's Views are lowest common denominator artists that, in my opinion, shouldn't be in the same stratosphere as the other nominees in this category. Even with Bieber's supposed, insert airquotes here, growth. There's no doubt that "Hello" was one of the biggest singles in the last decade, but frankly the rest of the album was forgettable. Beyonce brings the most clout into this group of nominees with Lemonade, but will it be enough to overcome the other nominees? Time will tell, and you'll surely hear all about it from Bey-Nation. But wait, there's a 5th nominee? Oh yes, the obligatory non-mainstream, alternative AotY nominee. This year it's alt-country icon and music industry tackling Sturgill Simpson with his fantastic album A Sailor's Guide To Earth. Out of all of these nominees, my pick would be him, but I don't see a repeat of 2011 or 2015's shocking victories for Arcade Fire and Beck, respectively. I think Bey takes this one, with Adele as a close second.
Joseph: While we will probably disagree several times on this list, the AotY category will not be one of them. I have no idea why Drake and Justin Bieber are on here, but that's the Grammys for you. They are clearly setting this show up as a "Beyonce versus Adele" showdown, (just look at virtually every music publication and you'll see it already being framed as such) which will certainly generate the clicks and viewership they are looking for. That said, I think there's a better chance than we might think that Sturgill pulls out a dark horse and wins this category, and here's why: up until Beyonce dropped Lemonade, I thought Adele was going to sweep the Grammys this year. Now, I think there's a good chance that Adele and Beyonce are going to split the voting pretty evenly, and that does give a third party like Sturgill a better chance to win than not. After all, the same thing happened in 2015 when Beck was the dark horse. (The vote likely split between Beyonce, Ed Sheeran, and Sam Smith which gave Beck a chance) That said, I would not bet money on this, and I'm with Derek-I think Beyonce will be walking out of the Grammys with her first AotY victory.
Who Should Win: Sturgill Simpson - A Sailor's Guide To Earth
Who Will Win: Beyonce - Lemonade
Derek: The songwriting single category really leaves a lot to be desired this year. The obvious winner from my perspective is Beyonce, as "Formation" probably has the deepest lyrics of the bunch. "Hello" is another Adele waterworks single that *sings as Adele* must have heard a thousand timesssss. Bieber tried to be deep, but it took a roomful of writers to get remotely close. Posner took some drugs and it sounds like it took Lukas Graham seven years to write the song "7 Years". Bey-nation should take this one, but don't be surprised if it goes to someone else.
Who Should Win: Beyonce - Formation
Joseph: I laugh at this category, and this is coming from a guy who has long cared little for lyrics. But there's no doubt these are some weak selections for SotY. I think this category will come down to Beyonce versus Adele, (again) with Adele pulling it out just because of the sheer popularity of Hello. I think many voters at The Academy will give Beyonce AotY and then give Adele Record + Song of the Year to try and balance them out. But that's just my uneducated guess. All of these picks to me are laughable, so it's hard to pick just one. But hey! Maybe they'll say fuck it and give this one to Justin Bieber. Just to try and make the Beliebers happy. Because why not?
Also, can I just point out how "7 Years" and "I Took a Pill in Ibiza" sound EXACTLY the same? I can't get over how terrible these songs are.
Who Should Win:
Derek: Beyonce - Formation
Joseph: David Bowie- Lazarus
Who Will Win:
Derek: Beyonce - Formation
Joseph: Adele - Hello
Derek: This is where things get more tricky. For the single of the year, there's no denying that "Hello" has been above and beyond one of the biggest singles of the decade. But does popularity equate to being the single of the year. Wait...yes it does. Adele takes this, and I think it's an easy call.
Joseph: Hey! Twenty One Pilots got a nomination! That's pretty cool. Even though I have NO idea how it did given the fact that "Stressed Out" was dropped in April of 2015. But what does it matter, right? None of these stand a chance against Adelle's "Hello." This just might be the easiest pick for the Academy this year, and I would be shocked if any name other than Adele's was called as it's hard to deny the cultural impact this single has had over the past year.
Who Should Win: Adele - Hello
Who Will Win: Adele - Hello
Derek: Chance The Rapper has been absolutely everywhere this year, and his debut album Coloring Book is one of the most played albums of the year. Everyone loves him, especially the music industry websites, so I think he takes this award pretty easily.
Joseph: Once again I'm with Derek on this. Hard to imagine seeing anyone other than Chance the Rapper getting the nomination. Though, as is per usual with this category, he's hardly a "new artist." I mean heck I remember when he packed the That Tent for a late night set back at Bonnaroo 2014. But hey, at least his nomination is not as bad is some of the previous winners. But I digress. Watch for a potential dark horse in The Chainsmokers because they are super popular, but I fully expect Chance's name to be called here.
Also, I have to give a shout-out to Kelsea Ballerini. We're obviously cynical about this show, but she's a super likeable sweetheart down here in Nashville, and I hope this nomination further elevates her career.
Who Should Win: Chance The Rapper
Who Will Win: Chance The Rapper
Derek: For the second year in a row, the rock album category is a complete clusterfuck, but I guess you can attribute that to the blurring lines between Rock and Alternative and the fall from grace of the traditional rock genre. If you remember, we gave Tell Me I'm Pretty a pretty mediocre review, but the other albums in this category aren't much better. Magma is your obligatory metal album nominee in this category, and it's a good one, but I don't think they take the golden phonograph. This is a toss up, but I think they give it to Blink-182 or Weezer because of name recognition.
Joseph: Just give this award to Blink-182 for their "comeback story" completion and be done with it. I can't even look at this joke of a list without wanting to throw my keyboard against the wall. Even from a popular standpoint, this list is ridiculous. Like....
Who Should Win: Cage The Elephant - Tell Me I'm Pretty
Who Will Win: Blink-182 - California
Joseph: Another hilarious category from the Grammys featuring a cover (albeit a good cover, but still a cover) and Beyonce. I guess The Academy thought they could slip "Don't Hurt Yourself" in because Jack White is featured on it, but it hardly classifies as rock in my book. I hope "Blackstar" is the winner here, or "Heathens," but I'm so cynical about all of this I would not be surprised to hear Beyonce's name called for this category. Because it's the Grammys.
Derek: Rock Performance is definitely one of the worst categories of the year. Just because Jack White is featured on a song doesn't immediately make it rock, although my beef is less with that and more with these left field choices. You're telling me that none of the Best Rock Album nominees have a song worthy of Best Rock Performance? Jeez, fellas. That should tell you a little bit about the quality of the category. I have to hand it to Disturbed. Their cover of "The Sound of Silence" was a refreshing take, especially from a band that hasn't had anything refreshing since 2005's Ten Thousand Fists. Alabama Shakes is the most pure "rock" of the bunch, but David Bowie just has to take the prize here. Right guys?
Who Should Win: David Bowie - Blackstar
Who Will Win: Beyonce - Don't Hurt Yourself
Joseph: This is one of the better category this year, despite the laughable nomination of Metallica's "Hardwired." (I was not a fan of this album at all) But, beyond that, it's a strong category. While I think "Burn the Witch" should get the award, I think it will ultimately go to "Heathens." No one can deny that out of this list, "Heathens" was by far the most popular song. "Heathens" has more than double the plays on Spotify than every other song on this list, combined. While that's hardly a good reason to give it the statue, it's all the reason the Grammys need.
Who Should Win: Radiohead - Burn the Witch
Who Will Win: Twenty One Pilots - Heathens
Derek: For alternative music lovers, this category is absolutely stacked. You have five musical legends going up against each other. Bon Iver with his musical pivot album 22, a Million, David Bowie with his swansong Blackstar, PJ Harvey with her long anticipated album, Iggy Pop with his Joshua Homme collaborative final album, and Radiohead with their least rock album yet. Boy, this will be fun. I think the Grammy voters realize this is the last time they'll be able to vote for David Bowie, so I think he takes the win here. Honestly though, I think any of these are worthy choices.
Joseph: This to me is the single most frustrating category of the Grammys this year. Because it is SO GOOD. Like....who picked these? How do we have such lackluster categories everywhere else and then all the sudden this? I wish all of these could win, or at LEAST be transferred over to the Best Rock Album category, but as is, I'm with Derek. I think this one will go to David Bowie. Even though the man has never needed a Grammy for validation, it would be pretty shocking to me if The Academy didn't give this award to Bowie simply out of respect. Or at least their idea of respect. It would be my choice as well. As great as all these choices are, I think Blackstar rose above the rest and is one of the best albums of the year.
Who Should Win: David Bowie - Blackstar
Who Will Win: David Bowie - Blackstar
There's always a lot to cover with the Grammys, and we have neither the time nor the length to cover it all. So, here are a few highlights in the other categories.
Joseph: If you can't tell already, I find the Grammys main selections this year pretty ludacris, but to their credit I will say it evens out a bit (just a bit) in the less-signifcant categories. The pop categories are still awful, but to be fair I wouldn't expect otherwise. At least Sia snuck in a couple of nominations, though expect all of these to be toss ups between Beyonce and Adele. Though I do expect JBiebs to sneak in one win because otherwise there will be angry Tweets for days from angry adolescent girls. Get those thumbs warmed up, girls.
Flume has been making a lot of splashes in the electronic world, and even though I won't even try to claim I know every name on those lists, I expect Flume and Chainsmokers to divide the electronic categories.
I have no idea why Beyonce's Lemonade is labeled as Best Urban Contemporary Album, but expect an easy win there because it's Beyonce and it's the Grammys.
The rap category is stacked heavy with Drake, Chance the Rapper, and Kanye West. I think all three will win at least one, and I'll take it a step further and say Chance wins Best Rap Performance, Kanye wins Best Rap/Sung Performance, (though Beyonce might steal this one because it's Beyonce and King Kendrick and Kanye has been even more Kanye-y recently) and Drake wins Best Rap Album. Even though that should go to Chance. Rap Song is a total clusterfuck, (in a good way) and honestly I have no idea who will pull that one out. I'd go with "Ultralight Beam", but I think "Hotline Bling" or "No Problem" stand a better chance. And Famous might dark horse it because the vote splits on everything else and some people might want to see Kanye's acceptance speech for his controversial Taylor Swift song. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
The country category is once again full of bro Country, but at least there's a lot of variety. Loretta Lynn's nomination for Best Country Album is awesome, but I am surprised/sad that Kelsea Ballerini didn't receive any love in these categories despite receiving a Best New Artist nomination. Even though he had the best country album of the year, Sturgill's blacklisting in Nashville means the odds of him winning Best Country Album are next to nill. I think bro Country is going to take it this year.
Finally, I want to highlight the Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media category. Ennio Morricone, one of the busiest film composers in the history of cinema with over 500 film credits to his name, has finally been receiving the recognition he deserves with Quentin Tarantino's The Hateful Eight. He received his first Oscar this year, and I fully expect him to win just his second Grammy (first one was for The Untouchables-take THAT, Derek) for this as well, despite the stiff competition.
Derek: HA, you know my feelings on movie scores. Not my cup of tea, but I am SO excited for you and Ennio.
I'll have to disagree with you on Best Country Album. The fact that he was even nominated of Album of the Year should be a big hint that Sturgill is going to scoop up the award. These aren't the CMA's or (enter one of the gazillion other country music award shows here). The voters comes from a number of different genres, not just the country music elite, and Sturgill's meteoric rise to the top of the outlaw country scene and cross-genre appeal makes him, in my opinion, a shoo-in to win this award.
In the Americana category, indie favorites The Avett Brothers got a nomination for their so-so album True Sadness, but I don't think they'll win it. I'll give it to Kris Kristofferson.
Here's to another year of awards, controversy, and judging a very subjective subject. Enjoy the show.
Now that 2015 is finally behind us, we at The Busted Amp would just like to extend our thanks for reading. It's a privilege to be able to write about something that we are passionate about and have someone actually care enough to take the time to read our ramblings.
That being said, it's time to reveal our end of year lists. 2015 was a great year for music, both live and recorded. We saw the triumphant returns of many of our favorite bands, while some of them slipped up with their new releases. Artists that we loved passed away, including Lemmy from Motorhead, BB King, Scott Weiland from Stone Temple Pilots, and Chris Squire from Yes. New bands took us by storm and made us instant fans, and we both rocked out to around 150 (100 Derek + 50 Joseph) artists and 4 music festivals (2 Derek + 2 Joseph) during the course of the year. All of that listening made it difficult to narrow down our favorites, but we did it.
So without further adieu, here are our favorite albums and songs of 2015.
While there's no doubt Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly is worthy of being the best album of the year, and I respect the hell out of it, it's just not in my wheelhouse.
Here are my favorite albums of the year according to what I've been listening to the most this year. Every album is linked to a song from the album to give you a taste of why I enjoyed it. Take a listen and enjoy.
Well, fortunately for the world, Kendrick Lamar will appear in my favorites, because I'm a rational human being. You'll find our lists to be somewhat similar, but that's definitely in part because our tastes are really quite identical. However, just a reminder, this is not what we felt were the best albums albums of the year. There is simply just too much music out there for us to get to all of it. No these are just our favorites from what we listened to. You probably don't agree with them, but that's ok. We still love you.
But it doesn't stop there. Now let's take a look at some of our favorite singles from the year. This was significantly harder, but we did our best for you. So we hope you enjoy them.
Joseph's Favorite Songs from 2015
Mark Ronson Ft. Bruno Mars - Uptown Funk
The official "mainstream" single on this list, Uptown Funk was a refreshing departure from the normal superhit, offering a funky dance line nestled in between some catchy choruses. I have definitely found myself playing this song a lot over the course of 2015.
Nathaniel Rateliff & The Night Sweats - S.O.B.
A great shout chorus, combined with Rateliff's lumberjack voice made this a favorite of mine to introduce to friends over the course of 2015. A fun song through and through.
Tame Impala - Let It Happen
While I can't call this the "best" single of 2015, it was definitely the "best" single I listened to throughout the year. A spectacular song featuring a great repeating section that made me think something happened to my computer the first time I listened to it. But it fits within the song! Well played, Kevin Parker.
Diane Coffee - Everyday
My God do I love this song. As an ordinary person might say, Diane Coffee's single, "Everyday," was my fight song for 2015. Whenever I needed a pick-me-up, Coffee was there. This trend will likely continue into the early part of 2016.
Wolf Alice -Moaning Lisa Smile
A late entrant to this list, this song was the moment I realized I had fallen in love with Wolf Alice. Featuring my favorite chorus of 2015, this song really showcases the greatness of Wolf Alice.
Derek's Favorite Songs from 2015:
Diane Coffee - Everyday
I had the honor and privilege of introducing this song to Joseph. Foxygen is, of course, one of my favorite bands of the past few years, and hearing Diane Coffee have such a great release was a very gratifying (especially considering Foxygen's latest ...And Star Power was pretty terrible).
Ryley Walker - Primrose Green
This beautifully constructed acoustic jazz folk song reminds me of a calm summer day, which is comforting in the depths of winter. There's no doubt that Walker has the compositional talent, but I'd like to hear his voice catch up. Unfortunately I missed his tour stop in Cincinnati this fall, but I hope he'll be back around soon enough.
Tame Impala - Eventually
Yes, I included this song above as the example in my album of the year list, but this is easily my favorite song on what is a fantastic album. The vocal effects, the head-bobbing jams, the psychedelic synths. Perfection.
Dawes - All Your Favorite Bands
The song for your ex-love when you wish them well but things just don't work out. Dawes always have had a way to tug at my heart strings, and this may be the best of them all. "I hope the world sees the same person that you always were to me. And may all your favorite bands stay together..."
The Lone Bellow - Fake Roses
When I first heard this song like in February at historic Memorial Hall in downtown Cincinnati, it gave me chills. The passion of this band never ceases to amaze me, and this song is just the tip of the iceberg.
Well, that concludes our look back at 2015! We hope you enjoyed this journey back to some of our favorite music of the year. We sure did! Stay tuned throughout 2016 as we continue our quest to justify our musical habits. Hope you'll join us in the future!
By: The Busted Amp Staff
It's that time of year again; the GRAMMYS have released their 2016 nominees. And for people who still take stock in these sort of things, the release of the nominees is like a second Christmas
While we at the Busted Amp don't like the popularity (or name recognition) contest that the GRAMMYS can so often be, we'd be remiss to not give an overview for your viewing pleasure. (Stay tuned later this month for our end of year lists!)
Without further adieu, here are the nominees:
Boy, are there some head scratchers in this bunch. I think this award comes down the 1989 vs. To Pimp a Butterfly. There's no denying that Taylor Swift put out the epitome of a good pop album this year, and naysayers of the genre need not look farther than Ryan Adams' cover album to see that the songs have cross-genre appeal. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Kendrick Lamar gave the world a poignant, politically charged, genre-fusing hip-hop masterpiece that cemented his spot in the top echelon of rap artists.
Admittedly, I was not super familiar with Chris Stapleton, and even though I think Traveller is a better country release than just about anything else in the genre this year, I cannot see it being more appealing than the above two. Sorry Chris. Last but not least, Alabama Shakes. This is the pick that, throughout the varies categories, I don't understand. Yes, I thought Sound & Color was a good album, and I liked the change of direction that the band took from their debut Boys & Girls, but that's about it. For me, this album didn't have nearly the punch as To Pimp a Butterfly or the repeatability of 1989. In fact, after a while I thought the album was a little forgettable, even in its own genre, which I'll talk about a little later.
We are going to agree on this one. Both in who should win and who will win. The GRAMMYS are absolutely going to favor the popular selection as they always do, but as usual the popular selection is not the best. While none of these albums will likely make it on my top 5 albums of the year, only one of them will make it to my top 10. King Kendrick's latest album is a cultural masterpiece, and one that will be looked at in the future as the 2010's Straight Outta Compton or The Chronic. It's already being compared to some of the greatest and culturally relevant hip hop albums ever. But none of those albums won a GRAMMY, and the same will almost certainly stay true here. It's been over a year since 1989 was dropped, but it's easy to forget that it was 2014's only album to go platinum on the sales charts. While it's definitely not the best album of the last year, it's hard to justify not rewarding the success of 2014's biggest seller. Expect this one to be winning a lot of undeserved awards. Don't worry, Adele fans: this will be her next year.
PS-While it's on a totally unrelated note, don't cast aside Chris Stapleton's debut album. Now granted I live in Nashville so I'm in the heart of country music, but I cannot tell you how many people have come into my store asking for his album. I've had more requests for this artist's new album in the last few months than any other artist combined. Just saying.
Who should win: Kendrick Lamar - To Pimp a Butterfly (consensus)
Who will win: Taylor Swift - 1989
Another easy to predict category. None of these songs are anywhere near my top 10 songs of the year, but then again they never are. This one is T. Swift's category to lose, but out of these choices I would personally go for "Girl Crush." Derek and I will likely disagree on this one, but honestly "Alright" was not my favorite single from King Kendrick. However the raw emotion of "Girl Crush" is what ultimately does it for me. But here I'm really just picking my favorite song out of a list of, frankly, dull songs. In my opinion the GRAMMYS put together this list so they could give T. Swift a GRAMMY among a group where even haters would have to agree it's ok she wins.
On another note, why is "Blank Space" specifically up for all the awards? Wasn't "Shake It Off" the more popular song? I know I liked that song far more than "Blank Space." Honestly I thought "Blank Space" was pretty forgettable. Oh well. What do I know.
Ah, the old "Record of the Year vs. Song of the Year" debate, we meet again. It's my understanding that Record of the Year is more about songwriting and Song of the Year is "the year's best single". If that's the case, then they got these nominations pretty right for what you'd expect them to be. Don't speak too soon, Joe, "Alright" isn't my favorite single either, and especially in the context of songwriting. "King Kunta" takes the cake there. But I digress.
Taylor Swift is bound to win a few of these, it's just a matter of which ones. I think she takes this one instead of Record of the Year, and that's fine with me.
Who should win: None of them, Derek: Taylor Swift - "Blank Space"
Who will win: Taylor Swift - "Blank Space" (consensus)
Hey! I actually have a preference here! "Uptown Funk" was easily my favorite mainstream hit from the past year. Its awesome combination of modern-day electronic music and '80s style funk made it the catchiest and funnest single of the year in my opinion. It absolutely deserves this award, but will it win it? Probably not. Once again I expect the committee to cave and give another award to Taylor Swift, because she really needs more recognition. But in all seriousness, this is a pretty tight category when it comes to successful singles from the past year. Definitely tighter than Song of the Year. I think the consensus will be pretty split between "Blank Space" and "Uptown Funk," however this split may open the door to pretty much anyone in this category. If The Weeknd's name gets called here, I would honestly not be even remotely surprised.
There's no doubt that "Uptown Funk" has been one of the biggest earworm in recent memory. That old school feeling, Bruno Mars, and all the girls hitting you hallelujah (woo!). When it comes to the best single, Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars are the heavyweights. The only problem being that they're up against other heavyweights. Taylor Swift and The Weeknd released two powerhouse songs of their own. Personally, I don't think "Blank Space" is as strong as, say, "Shake It Off", but both it and "Can't Feel My Face" are going to make this category mighty interesting. As for the other two nominees, Ed Sheeran has the unfortunate match up against the formerly mentioned songs, and this year "Thinking Out Loud" just doesn't have the fighting power. I'd be shocked if D'Angelo wins, not that "Really Love" isn't a good song, but to me it's not even in the same league.
Who I think should win: Mark Ronson feat. Bruno Mars - "Uptown Funk" (consensus)
Who will win: Mark Ronson feat. Bruno Mars - "Uptown Funk"
This category has always been one of the most mind-boggling, frustrating categories of the GRAMMYS, especially recently. I think the favorite to win this category is Meghan Trainor, even though she was nominated twice last year for Record and Song of the Year for "All About That Bass". I think between Sam Hunt, James Bay, and Tori Kelly, it's really anyone's game. Hunt is also nominated for Country Album of the Year, so I think his chances are a bit higher than the rest. The indie crowd, including myself, are going to be pulling for Australian Courtney Barnett because of her fantastic release Sometimes I Sit And Think, And Sometimes I Just Sit, which has, in my opinion, some of the best storytelling of any album released this
I definitely agree that in recent years this category has been a head-scratcher. I think Meghan Trainor will win this category easily because GRAMMYS will want to include her in this year's festivities somehow. Even though she was also nominated last year....? This makes little sense, but I won't question it. I'll be hoping for Courtney Barnett to pull off the upset but I think too many pop fans would storm the Twitter front if she actually did for the GRAMMYS taste. I do miss the years when Bon Iver would win and the pop fans would storm Twitter though....
Who should win: Courtney Barnett
Who will win: Meghan Trainor
I have a few bones to pick with this year's Rock Album nominees. First, how in the world do they consider James Bay rock? Second, if Slipknot's song "Custer" is up for Best Metal Performance, how is the album up for Best Rock Album and not Best Metal Album? Third, Muse's album Drones has to be one of the biggest piles of shit this year. It was utterly terrible and borderline unlistenable. Either I'm just getting old, forgot what rock is, or this category is nothing but junk this year. I certainly don't think rock had this bad of a year.
Out of this list, give the GRAMMYS to Death Cab For Cutie, even though I didn't think that album was phenomenal either, but at least it was dark and brooding because Ben Gibbard and Zooey Deschanel divorced. This list is so forgettable that I don't have any clue who they'll actually pick. I'm going to say James Bay for the sole reason that he's had the biggest "hits" of this year from the nominees. Either him or Muse - solely because of name recognition, because it can't possibly be for the actual album.
Lol. That's all I have to say. Every year, the GRAMMYS have at least one "Lol" category with an absolutely ridiculous group of members comprising the category. Last year it was the Best Metal Category. This year it's the Best Rock Category. I really don't care for any of these albums, so I will refrain from having a stake in this fight at all, but I will 100% agree with Derek. Muse was once my favorite band. I stuck with them all the way through The Resistance, but in recent years even I admit they have lost much of their former glory, and the fact that they are on this list is an insult to the genre. I'm worried that the GRAMMYS will take this whole thing one step further and even nominate them for a victory simply due to the recognizability of their name. But, I don't think they will go THAT far and will instead hand this ridiculous category to James Bay. Shame on you, GRAMMYS.
Who Derek wants to win: Death Cab For Cutie - Kintsugi
Who will win: James Bay - Chaos and the Calm
For clarity, Best Performance is for the people who actually perform the song as well as the songwriters. Best Song (see below) is for the songwriters only.
The inclusion of Alabama Shakes was a no brainer considering their inclusion in the Album of the Year discussions. It's definitely the single that's gotten the most airplay from the album, and a worthy addition to the nominees since there is no "Best Alternative Performance". "Something From Nothing" was the best single on the new Foo Fighters ambitious album/tv series, even though the tv series was much better than the album itself. Wolf Alice is huge across the pond in the UK, but hasn't quite broken out here in the USA yet. A win here could change all of that, and "Moaning Lisa Smile" is a churning, guttural jam of a song to debut with.
I'm a little confused on the category choices for Florence + The Machine and Elle King. Florence is also nominated for Best Pop Vocal Album and Elle, in my opinion, is straight up pop. Despite all of this, I think Florence + The Machine take the prize.
Ya, I think Florence is on this list so she can win a category, because she is definitely not the first thing that comes to mind when I think of rock music. She's also not the second or third thing that comes to mind either. Yet, here she is, and she'll likely win the category. Which is a shame because, while I do like Florence Welch despite my terrible experience seeing her live, I absolutely loved "Moaning Lisa Smile." It's one of my favorite songs of the year and is a shining example of where the rock genre can move towards. Never thought I'd be upset at the prospect of Florence Welch winning a GRAMMY but I guess that day was bound to come eventually.
Who should win: Wolf Alice - "Moaning Lisa Smile"
Who will win: Florence + The Machine - "What Kind of Man"
Again, for clarity, Best Performance is for the people who actually perform the song as well as the songwriters (see above). Best Song is for the songwriters only.
My opinions here aren't much different than the Rock Performance category. I don't see why the songwriting for James Bay and Highly Suspect are any better than Wolf Alice, Foo Fighters, and even Courtney Barnett, who's up for Best New Artist.
If Florence wins the last category, Elle King will win this one. Or it will be reversed. This year rock was the official dumping ground for the GRAMMYS, with most of the picks making little to no sense or not even being classified as rock by everyone but the GRAMMYS. And ya, why are James Bay and Highly Suspect both in this category when Wolf Alice and Foo Fighters aren't? And why least rock-iest tracks in both categories? Oh. That's right. So the GRAMMYS can give them these categories and let T. Swift sweep the pop categories. Give the people what they want, right?
Who should win: Alabama Shakes - "Don't Wanna Fight"
Who will win: Elle King - "Ex's & Oh's"
I think I am one of the few people in the music world that doesn't understand why Bjork gets the praise that she does. To me, at least, her voice is abrasive and hard to listen to and a lot of the music is jumbled and noisy. Part of me wouldn't be surprised if she takes this category, because she has 14 nominations without a win, which is the sixth highest all time without a win. I think it would be unfortunate if she got it here though.
The big gun here is obviously Alabama Shakes, who is also nominated for Album of the Year. If they don't win the latter, I wouldn't be surprised if they win this. If they do win Album of the Year, however, I can see this award going to someone else.
Personally, I'm rooting for Tame Impala, which put out one of the best records of the year, and an album I'm still listening to on heavy repeat. I wouldn't be shocked if they gave it to Wilco because they have a pretty huge following and Star Wars was a pretty decent album overall...(Star Wars HYPE).
I think My Morning Jacket is the clear underdog here with The Waterfall, even though it was a solid follow-up to the also GRAMMY nominated Circuital. Even though I think hit a sweet spot between Circuital and frontman Jim James' solo album Regions of Light and Sound of God, I think there are too many better choices here for them to garner the necessary votes.
For all my bitching about the GRAMMYS, I will give them this category. They did an excellent job here, lining up some of the best albums of the year in this category. I'm with Derek on this one, though: I really want to see Tame Impala walk away with the most prestigious honor at this year's ceremony, but I don't think the GRAMMYS have the guts to give this award to an experimental/psychedelic group. No, I think we'll just have to be impressed with the fact that they even received a nomination. I think this award will come down to either Bjork or Alabama Shakes.
While I do like Bjork more than Derek does, I do also think she's rather overrated. So many people revere Bjork, and I don't really see why short of the fact that she's inspired a lot of big name artists we see today. But this album to me was just meh, and it would be a damn shame to see this category go to her simply because the GRAMMYS feel bad they've nominated her 14 times without a nomination, because her fans are the kind of fans to be acutely aware of this fact. Wilco stands a pretty good chance just because of his fervently loyal following, but his following also couldn't care less how many awards his albums receive. Alabama Shakes will likely be the ones to walk away with this award, especially since they don't stand a chance in the main category against T. Swift. I'm ok with this because Sound & Color is an excellent album, but both My Morning Jacket and Tame Impala had better albums this year.
Who should win: Tame Impala - Currents
Who will win: Alabama Shakes - Sound & Color
While there are a lot of other categories we could talk about, that would make for a ridiculously long post, so we'll just leave you with some of our thoughts.
While we can be left to wonder what the heck the GRAMMYS were thinking with their rock categories, it's pretty hard to deny that Kendrick Lamar is going to sweep the rap categories. Especially given the infamous "Macklemore over Kendrick" debacle that happened a few years ago. The Best Country Album category is also going to be a tight one, with the GRAMMYS likely wanting to hand the award to Sam Hunt or Kacey Musgraves to stay in line with "pop" country, but they'll be overlooking one of the best traditional country albums of recent memory in The Traveler in the process. Other than that, the only other thing I want to mention is the egregious overlook of Kamasi Washington's The Epic in Best Jazz Album. That's a head-scratcher if I ever saw one, given the fact that The Epic is very close to my favorite album of the year and a monumental accomplishment within the jazz world, but whatever, guys. That's cool.
I could not agree more with Kamasi Washington. The Epic is a fascinating, heart-stopping, exhilarating adventure and its absence on the nominee list for Best Jazz Album is a travesty. For Best Country Album, I was not at all impressed with Kacey Musgraves' album, and I found her live act at Bunbury Music Festival to be lacking in both energy and interesting material. I think this one goes to the heavy hitting newcomer, Chris Stapleton, who actually released a gritty, relatable album.. And finally, for the rap categories, Kendrick is life, Kendrick is love.
Enjoy the show.
By: Joseph Kathmann
Last week, a major event went down in the music industry. SESAC, the third-largest performing rights organization, or PRO, in the country, purchased Harry Fox Agency, the country's only distributor of mechanical royalties. Isn't that amazing? Did I just blow your mind? I know. It's hard not to be blown away by that news. Well, for those of you who have no idea what I just said, I'll fill you in. So SESAC (what that stands for is outdated so don't worry about it) is one of three performing rights organizations in the great US of A. What does that mean? Well, a PRO is what gets songwriters paid. They are the distributors of royalties, or what a songwriter lives off of as he/she tries to makes a living. So why do songwriters exist? Well, many major pop and country artists today do not write their own music. They simply perform it. This practice is so widespread that Taylor Swift makes a big deal out of the fact that she's also her own songwriter. The practice also dates back to the dawn of modern music. Elvis? He was a performer, not a songwriter. The Rolling Stones manager famously locked Keith Richards and Mick Jagger in a room until they came out with an original song, "As Tears Go By," and wrote their own music ever since. There's a lot of money to be had in being a songwriter, which is why many make a (somewhat) comfortable living doing it.
Next up, what's a mechanical royalty? A mechanical royalty is a the royalty a songwriter gets from every album sold. Right now, when you buy Brad Paisley's hit single "Whiskey Lullaby," songwriter Jon Randall gets a mechanical royalty for it. When you buy Paisley's album Mud on the Tires, Randall will get another mechanical royalty for that song and any other song he wrote on the album. There's a bit more to it than that, but that's a rough summary of what a mechanical royalty is.
So, now that you know what everything means, is it a big deal to you yet that SESAC bought Harry Fox Agency? No? Well, here's why it matters: up until now, Harry Fox Agency was the sole distributor of mechanical royalties. They kept the royalties the exact same for every songwriter and artist, regardless of what PRO they belonged to, (there are three in the US, remember, and every selling artist and songwriter in the country is a member of one of them) and everything went by smoothly. That is, until the Internet came along.
The dawn of streaming services, both for music (Spotify) and TV shows, (Netflix) and piracy has thrown mechanical royalties for a major loop. Time after time we see a songwriter come out and say they made only $2,700 in songwriting royalties off a song streamed 43 million times on Pandora. We see songwriters complain about laughably minuscule royalties on their music in TV shows that's streamed on Netflix. iTunes has been targeted for not distributing royalties properly. The numbers are wildly inconsistent, and songwriters are struggling to even make a poor living off of these small royalty checks nowadays. In an attempt to combat this, the other two PROs, ASCAP and BMI, (both have more songwriters in their memberships than SESAC) have been lobbying Congress recently to allow them to distribute mechanical royalties (and other royalties, but we won't get into that). They are doing this in an attempt to make themselves look more appealing for incoming songwriters who are trying to decide which PRO to join, while also benefiting these songwriters by distributing higher/more thorough mechanical royalties in the process. The problem with this is that ASCAP and BMI are publicly traded companies; they are reigned in by government laws, many of which were put in place before anyone had even heard of the word "internet." The rumor had long been that had ASCAP and BMI successfully convinced Congress to allow them to get into the mechanical royalty business, SESAC, a privately-owned company, would purchase Harry Fox Agency to compete with ASCAP and BMI. Well, even though ASCAP and BMI have yet to convince Congress to let them in on the mechanical royalties game, SESAC went ahead and purchased Harry Fox Agency to get a head-start on the other two PROs.
So, now that I bored you with a lot of music industry drama, here's the question that matters. Why should you care? After all you don't care about songwriters, you just want good music right? Well, that's exactly it. Without Mark Ronson, there is no "Uptown Funk." Without Pharrell, there is no "Blurred Lines." Without Leonard Cohen, there is no "Hallelujah." Without Albert Hammond, there is no "One Moment in Time." The songwriter is a pivotal part of the creative process, and nowadays they are treated with little to no respect. After all, Beyoncé has more money than she knows what to do with, so why should we care about where the money goes. Well, because there are thousands of talented songwriters vying to get their music heard. Vying just to make a living doing what they love. Julie Keltonic is a songwriter (and a member of SESAC) who has made a living writing Christian music. "I see so many insanely talented writers turning away from their calling, and perusing other industries in the name of survival," she says. "We need people advocating for writers."
That's what SESAC is hoping to do by purchasing Harry Fox Agency. Many songwriters have never seen a check from Harry Fox Agency-mechanical royalties always get sent to the PRO and publishers first before being distributed to the songwriter-but with SESAC's acquisition, many songwriters within the PRO will likely see an increase in mechanical royalties in time. This acquisition also puts additional pressure on Congress to allow ASCAP and BMI to distribute mechanical royalties as well. Additional competition = higher royalties for songwriters. Higher royalties for songwriters = better songs written as fewer talented songwriters are discouraged by a lack of money in the industry. Better songs written = better music you get to listen to! Better music is always good, right? While this acquisition will not fix all the problems within the music industry, (not by a long shot, but that's for another conversation) it's definitely a mighty good place to start. "I look forward to seeing how [SESAC] implements new ideas to make licensing more valuable for writers and publishers," Keltonic says. "I trust the people at SESAC to continue their good work with their new acquisition."
http://www.musicrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/sesac-hfa.jpg (SESAC, HFA photo)
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18iwgcfj83c3gpng/original.png (Spotify logo)
http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/story/exclusive-book-excerpt-leonard-cohen-writes-hallelujah-in-the-holy-or-the-broken-20121203/leonardcohen-624x420-1354563972.jpg (Leonard Cohen photo)
By: The Busted Amp Staff
Well, it's hard to believe, but we're already halfway through 2015. So, it's only natural for us to talk about some of our favorite albums of the year so far, right? We have a few categories on this list. First is our top five albums of 2015 so far. Then, we'll talk about what we feel is the most disappointing album of the year thus far, and then a few songs that we've been playing on repeat for the last few months. Ok ready?
JOSEPH'S FAVORITE ALBUMS OF 2015 SO FAR (In no particular order - scroll over the album for an explanation.)
Twenty One Pilots - Blurryface
Kamasi Washington - The Epic
Father John Misty - I Love You, Honeybear
Kendrick Lamar - To Pimp a Butterfly
Susanne Sundør - Ten Love Songs
JOSEPH'S BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENT OF 2015 SO FAR
Mumford and Sons - Wilder Mind
For all the hype surrounding this album; with the hullabaloo surrounding the notion that Mumford and Sons were "going electric," what we got was an extremely bland The National-ripoff. I've listened to Sigh No More so much in the car, but now, two albums later, Mumford and Sons have all but lost the magic of that first album that made them as a great as they were. What's worse, now we might get one more electric album before we get a "triumphant return to folk" or some crap. You used to be good, Mumford and Sons....
JOSEPH'S FAVORITE SONGS OF 2015 SO FAR (In no particular order)
Florence + The Machine - "Delilah"
X Ambassadors - "Unsteady"
Father John Misty - "Chateau Lobby #4"
Twenty One Pilots - "Heavydirtysoul"
Susanne Sundfør - "Memorial"
DEREK'S TOP FIVE ALBUMS OF 2015 SO FAR (In no particular order - scroll over the album for an explanation)
Sufjan Stevens - Carrie & Lowell
Father John Misty - I Love You, Honeybear
Kamasi Washington - The Epic
The Decemberists - What a Terrible World, What a Beautiful World
The Lone Bellow - Then Came The Morning
DEREK'S BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENT OF 2015 SO FAR
Mumford and Sons - Wilder Mind
It's Bob Dylan goes electric...badly.
DEREK'S FAVORITE SONGS OF 2015 SO FAR
Tame Impala - "Let It Happen"
The Decemberists - "Make You Better"
Shamir - "On The Regular"
Houndmouth - "Sedona"
By: Derek Jung with an addendum from Joseph Kathmann
DEREK: Cincinnati production company Self Diploma announced Monday evening that it will be cancelling its popular summer concert series on Fountain Square in response to the violence that led to at least seven arrests, one hospitalization, and a two injured police officers. The series, which has hosted some of the biggest up-and-coming hip-hop and electronic artists as well as popular DJs, often attracts several thousand attendees to the square on Saturday nights during the summer.
According to police reports, groups in the crowd became unruly around 11pm, and when officers moved in, they started throwing bottles, fireworks, and other items at police. Backup was called and officers in full riot gear eventually dispersed the crowd. Read a full report of the incident here.
My family and I were unlucky enough to stumble upon the aftermath of the unrest. We were about a half block away from the square when we heard two distinct booms approximately a half second apart. Immediately a flood of people turned the corner of 5th Street and Walnut and ran south towards us. While we later learned that people were setting off fireworks in trash cans, at the time we thought for sure that it was gun fire. We ran down to 4th Street and west to Vine before entering the hotel adjacent to the square to avoid the chaos. I counted around a dozen police cars on scene, but by that time the incident was over.
Many people have been clamoring about the racial implications of cancelling the series, and while I do think that the Self Diploma concerts have a higher minority demographic than the Midpoint Indie series on Friday or other events during the week, I think organizers made the right decision in cancelling the remaining dates after this coming weekend's show. This wasn't the first incident at one of their shows. Police have been called on several occasions in the past for rowdy and disorderly crowds, but nothing of this magnitude.
I think the Self Diploma shows could return given appropriate security changes. For example, I think that these events need to be at least 18+, preferably 21+. Three of the seven people arrested were between the ages of 16 and 23, and witnesses at the scene have said that it was these teenagers specifically that instigated and escalated the violence. I think next week's show, which Self Diploma stated will have extra security, is a big test as to whether a return would be an option with the City, 3CDC, and with sponsors. (EDITOR'S NOTE: Self Diploma has now cancelled next week's show as well) In a city environment that is already on edge from the jump in gun violence this year and being in the spotlight for Major League Baseball's All-Star Game next week, this was an unneeded black eye that necessitated a swift, albeit unfortunate response.
Read Self Diploma's full press release below.
JOSEPH: I wasn't there. Let's just get that out of the way. So I can't provide a firsthand account. That's Derek's job, and he did it swimmingly. However, I have been following the situation closely, and am disappointed with fallout. While ultimately necessary, it is unfortunate to see this great event be cancelled outright because of this incident. My biggest quirk, however, is how this event immediately became an issue of race. Conservatives are upset because a couple African American teens beat up a White dude and it was recorded, and are now looking at the actions of a few as a representation of the entire African American community. Liberals are now upset with response of the city and Self Diploma, claiming that the city is racist themselves for canceling the concert series. Well, I'm going to upset everyone: hush up. Seriously. You're both wrong. Conservatives: group mentality is a powerful thing. Systemic racism has been piling up all across the country like gasoline, and all it takes is one person to throw a match on the situation in any way and it lights the fire of group mentality. Once the crowd got rowdy, there was no stopping it. And don't say you'd act any differently. Had you been an African American forced to grow up in constant fear of being targeted because of the color of your skin, you would've done the exact same thing in that moment on Fountain Square. If you deny that, you're just ignorant. I don't care how you were raised, because there were lots of good people in that mob too. Liberals: the city has to do everything they can to ensure that we don't have an incident like this during All-Star Week. For one week, we are on the national stage, and if we mess it up it will tarnish the image of the city for a ridiculously long time. Honestly part of me was shocked that this event wasn't cancelled sooner just as a precaution. I wouldn't have even blamed them then. The city needs to do everything in its power to make the biggest week of the year go by perfectly, and if that means canceling the entire Fountain Square concert series for a few weeks, then I wouldn't complain. You have to look at the big picture, guys. Here's to hoping they bring it back next year, and we be more grateful for it when they do.
EDIT: Yesterday, Self Diploma cancelled this Saturday's performance as well. With the start of All-Star Week on Sunday, the city felt the move was necessary. Self Diploma hopes to return next year.
By: The Busted Amp Staff
JOSEPH: So, let's talk about the big issue rattling everyone's brains right now: Apple Music. As you know, there's been a lot of controversy surrounding this new streaming service. The biggest of which was the controversy surrounding the issue of royalties (or lack there of) due to artists during the service's 3-month trial period. A contract was leaked by the record industry that said that no royalties whatsoever would be paid to artists, labels, or anyone while us, the listener, was using the trial period of the service. Or if someone was given the service for free from Apple. The timing would be killer: the 3-month trial period would kill indie artists everywhere that release their music before the holiday season. Traditionally, the holiday season is when major artists drop new albums, and as a result indies tend to avoid this time because, as much as I'd like to think Kishi Bashi can compete with Beyonce, he cannot. So all of their new music would be streamed to no end on Apple Music, and they wouldn't see a dime of revenue for it. Additionally, there were reports of Apple threatening smaller labels and artists, saying, "If you don't put your music on Apple Music, we're going to remove it from iTunes." This would obviously kill smaller artists, as their biggest revenue stream digitally is still purchases on iTunes. However, Taylor Swift recently used her power as an extremely influential artist to write an open letter to Apple vowing to never put her music on the site because of these tactics. Then, suddenly, Apple changed its mind. Now, they will pay royalties during the trial period, however I'm not convinced everything is now perfect in Cupertino.
I'm about to kick it over to you, Derek, but I wanna throw up a few quick thoughts to get us going: I'm not buying the whole Taylor Swift and Apple were in cohorts conspiracy theories. However, I don't trust Apple at all. I say this as I type on my 2010 MacBook Pro, and I'll likely text you in a bit from my iPhone 5, and before I go to bed I'll scour my iPad 2's MLB At Bat app for a few Cincinnati Reds highlights. (If there are any.) But my trust in the company has been completely destroyed in the last year, as I've watched the company become more obsessed with itself and more and more anti-consumer in the process. Apple's entry into the streaming industry has been surrounded by controversy, (let's not forget how before the announcement of Apple Music, they were putting pressure on labels to get them to ask Spotify to remove their free tier completely-the definition of a conflict of interest and one which they are still in legal heat over) and also why the largest company in the WORLD, with more market capital than anyone else in the WORLD, couldn't afford to spare some money to give to artists during their trial period is BEYOND me. They are trying to position themselves as the saviors of the music industry. How do they expect to convince those of us who care about the music industry's well-being that they're our saviors when it takes Taylor Swift getting the mainstream listener involved for them to be like, "Whoa. You're right. We'll pay you." I mean, seriously? I'll tell you what I think I'm going to do, Derek. I will likely use this service for about a day, then I'm going to go back to my Spotify Premium. Sure, Spotify has its problems, but at least it doesn't threaten indie artists with removing their music from iTunes if they don't agree to Apple Music's stipulations. What do you think?
DEREK: First off, let me say that the last Apple product that I bought was an iPod Classic because it had the most space for an MP3 player and I had a substantial music library at the time, so I am not beholden to the almighty Apple. Second, I think that you made some great points about Apple's motivation (good or bad) for not paying artists during the first 3 months. I think that, as a publicly traded company, they are expected to trim expenses where they can.
In this respect, one can also argue that since record labels agreed to these terms with Apple, artists like Taylor Swift have less of a right to disagree with terms their labels agreed to already. This is from a purely business perspective and not at all on what I consider right or wrong.
I think Taylor needs to have more understanding of what people in her camp are doing. She's been getting some backlash from photographers for what her management firm makes them agree to in order to shoot her concerts. Namely, the photographer has to get permission every time they use or publish pictures taken at her shows. Critics, including myself, say that photographers should have exclusive rights to their photographs without exception because that is their art form, just as music is to Taylor Swift. If she is going to publicly claim that her rights as an artist are being violated by Apple Music, she needs to know the nuances of her business as a whole too.
In the end, this may be one of the nails in the coffin for Apple Music. I think one thing that AM has over a service like TIDAL is that most people have already used the iTunes Store. There's already brand recognition beyond that of the artists involved. The problem with being one of the last to enter a market is that, as was a problem for TIDAL, people are already in the habit of using services like Pandora or Spotify. I have yet to see a reason, application feature or pricing, what would take me away from a freemium service that I'm already in the habit of using. I can tell you right away that I haven't tried TIDAL, I have no plans to try Apple Music, and I probably won't try whatever else is released until there are service features that get me excited enough to change my habits.
JOSEPH: Excellent points. Building off what you said towards the end there, I really think Apple is going to back track on not having a free tier shortly after the 3 month trial period ends and the service sees a mass exodus. So it's important for them as a company and for the artists/labels involved that are putting their music on there that they begin to establish royalties for the inevitable free tier once they go freemium. Not only that, but now they've put themselves in the position to give any amount they want for royalties on the trial tier that will likely transfer over to the freemium tier. Can you say $1 for 1,000,000 streams? Given Apple's recent track record, this is a very scary possibility to me.
Now I'm not going to sit here and call Taylor Swift a savior, because she has her own problems for sure. But at least she has the balls to step up and use her power and influence as a major mainstream artist for good. Because all of you saying that this should've been an indie artist who sent in the open letter instead of Taylor Swift, I got news for you: the only people who care what Automagik has to think is Automagik fans. That's it. Most of their 2,000 Facebook fans will say, "Right on guys! Way to speak the truth and stand up for what you believe in!" and then do nothing. But every mainstream fan will say, "Who?" and then stop caring. That is if they even hear about it. The music industry DESPERATELY needs more mainstream musicians willing to stand up for controversial beliefs like Taylor Swift does, and even though she is far from perfect herself, I still respect her tremendously for at least putting herself out there.
Finally, the music industry has long struggled to come to grips with the popularity of digital media, and they have always been behind on the popularity of anything involved with it. The notion that Apple is going to save the music industry? Well, if Steve Jobs were still alive and a major piece of the company, I might agree with you. But now? It's pure BS. As you said, Derek, the only reason anyone will use Apple Music is for the name, and we'll have to see if the name alone is worth enough to get people to leave Spotify. I'd be willing to bet the farm it isn't.
https://consequenceofsound.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/apple-music.jpg?w=807 (Apple Music)
http://cdn.makeuseof.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/taylor-swift-apple-music-644x373.jpg?20efae (T Swift Apple pic)
http://s.thestreet.com/files/tsc/v2008/photos/contrib/uploads/tidal.jpg (TIDAL pic)